Page Header

Analysis of Teachers’ Competences for Industry 4.0 Subjects: A Case of Thai Higher Education Institutions

Rui M. Lima, Rui M. Sousa, Lino Costa, Cristiano Jesus, Diana Mesquita, Athakorn Kengpol, Warapoj Meethom, Pisut Koomsap


The era of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) requires technology and engineering higher education institutions to provide their students with the competences inherent to this evolution. This requires teaching staff training, but first, naturally, teachers’ level of competences must be assessed. The objective of this work is to assess the current level of teaching staff self-perceived competences related to product, process, and production in the I4.0 Era, using a tailor-made questionnaire. Additionally, the work aims to evaluate the relation between academic degrees and years of experience, with the level of self-perceived competences. In terms of methodology, the development of the questionnaire’s items was based on the Acatech framework and existing I4.0 courses. The questionnaire was validated through the following steps: 1) think-aloud procedures with 4 teaching staff, and 2) test and retest statistics validation, developed with approximately 30 teaching staff from the referred institutions. Then, the questionnaire was applied to more than 200 teaching staff. Two I4.0 areas showed a lower level of self-perceived competence: Data Analytics and Digital Manufacturing. It became evident that the teaching staff, regardless of their level of experience or academic degree, may benefit from organizational and people management training including processes and techniques related to I4.0.


[1] R. M. Ellahi, M. U. Ali Khan, and A. Shah, “Redesigning curriculum in line with industry 4.0,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 151, pp. 699–708, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs. 2019.04.093.

[2] M. Hernandez-de-Menendez, C. A. Escobar Díaz, and R. Morales-Menendez, “Engineering education for smart 4.0 technology: A review,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 789–803, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12008-020-00672-x.

[3] A. Kengpol, N. Koohathongsumrit, and W. Meethom, “Design, implementation, and improvement of the course for master’s degree Program in Industry 4.0: A case study in digital factory subject,” in PAEE/ALE’2020, International Conference on Active Learning in Engineering Education, 12th International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education (PAEE) and 17th Active Learning in Engineering Education Workshop (ALE), 2020, pp. 271–278.

[4] P. Koomsap, D. H. N. Ayutthaya, R. M. Lima, A. Kengpol, and S. Jirasatitsin, “Strategic design for industrial engineering curriculum development to support sustainable smart industry,” in 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2020), 2020, pp. 6150–6155, doi: 10.21125/inted.2020.1667.

[5] R. M. Lima, D. Mesquita, R. M. Sousa, M. T. T. Monteiro, and J. S. Cunha, “Curriculum analysis process: Analysing fourteen industrial engineering programs,” in International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education, 2019, pp. 92–101.

[6] P. Koomsap, H. T. Luong, R. M. Lima, T. Nitkiewicz, W. Chattinnawat, and D. H. Naayutthaya, “Roles of MSIE graduates to support Thailand sustainable smart industry,” in Transdisciplinary Engineering for Complex Socio-technical Systems: Proceedings of the 26th ISTE International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, 2019, pp. 75–84, doi: 10.3233/ATDE190110.

[7] P. Koomsap, D. H. N. Ayutthaya, T. Nitkiewicz, R. M. Lima, and H. T. Luong, “Course design and development: Focus on student learning experience,” in International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education, 2019, pp. 144–153.

[8] N. Koohathongsumrit, N. Phakkulhab, A. Kengpol, and W. Meethom, “A survey of requirements for Thailand’s industry 4.0: The perspectives from academics and entrepreneurs,” in International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education, 2020, pp. 135–142.

[9] D. Mourtzis, J. Angelopoulos, and N. Panopoulos, “A virtual collaborative platform for education in the design and simulation of aeronautics equipment: The teaching factory 5.0 paradigm,” SSRN Journal, 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4071869.

[10] D. Mourtzis, N. Panopoulos, J. Angelopoulos, S. Zygomalas, G. Dimitrakopoulos, and P. Stavropoulos, “A hybrid teaching factory model for supporting the educational process in COVID-19 era,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 104, pp. 1626–1631, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procir. 2021.11.274.
[11] S. Tay, L. Te Chuan, A. Aziati, and A. N. A. Ahmad, “An overview of industry 4.0: Definition, components, and government initiatives,” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, vol. 10, Dec. 2018, Art. no. 14.

[12] S. J. Oks, M. Jalowski, M. Lechner, S. Mirschberger, M. Merklein, B. Vogel-Heuser, and K. M. Möslein, “Cyber-physical systems in the context of industry 4.0: A review, categorization and outlook,” Information Systems Frontiers, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10252-x.

[13] D. Lee and H. Lee, “IoT service classification and clustering for integration of IoT service platforms,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 6859–6875, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11227-018-2288-7.

[14] S. C. Renjith, K. Park, and G. E. Okudan Kremer, “A design framework for additive manufacturing: Integration of additive manufacturing capabilities in the early design process,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 329–345, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12541-019-00253-3.

[15] A. Khalid, P. Kirisci, Z. Ghrairi, K.-D. Thoben, and J. Pannek, “A methodology to develop collaborative robotic cyber physical systems for production environments,” Logistics Research, vol. 9, no. 1, Nov. 2016, Art. no. 23, doi: 10.1007/ s12159-016-0151-x.

[16] G. Schuh, R. Anderl, R. Dumitrescu, A. Krüger, and M. T. Hompel, “Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index: Managing the digital transformation of companies,” Acatech - National Academy of Science and Engineering, Munich, Germany, 2020.

[17] C. Lloyd and J. Payne, “Raising the quality of vocational teachers: Continuing professional development in England, Wales and Norway,” Research Papers in Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1080/02671522. 2010.483524.

[18] P. Grollmann, “The quality of vocational teachers: Teacher education, institutional roles and professional reality,” European Educational Research Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 535–547, 2008, doi: 10.2304/eerj.2008.7.4.535.

[19] P. K. Misra, “VET teachers in Europe: Policies, practices and challenges,” Journal of Vocational Education & Training, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 27–45, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1080/13636820.2011.552732.

[20] D. Dymock and M. Tyler, “Towards a more systematic approach to continuing professional development in vocational education and training,” Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 198–211, 2018, doi: 10.1080/ 0158037X.2018.1449102.

[21] H. Bound, “Vocational education and training teacher professional development: Tensions and context,” Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 107–119, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2011.554176.

[22] P. Andersson and S. Köpsén, “VET teachers between school and working life: Boundary processes enabling continuing professional development,” Journal of Education and Work, vol. 32, no. 6–7, pp. 537–551, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13639080.2019.1673888.

[23] D. Mourtzis, J. Angelopoulos, and N. Panopoulos, “A teaching factory paradigm for personalized perception of education based on extended reality (XR),” SSRN Journal, 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 4071876.

[24] L. S. Almeida and T. Freire, Metodologia da Investigação em Psicologia e Educação. Braga, Portugal: Candeias Artes Gráficas, 2008.

[25] J. Drennan, “Cognitive interviewing: Verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 57–63, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2648.2003.02579.x.

[26] V. K. Aldridge, T. M. Dovey, and A. Wade, “Assessing Test-retest reliability of psychological measures: Persistent methodological problems,” European Psychologist, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 207–218, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000298.

[27] IBM, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, 27th ed. New York: IBM Corp, 2020.

[28] T. K. Koo and M. Y. Li, “A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research,” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155–163, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

[29] J. M. Cortina, “What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 98–104, 1993, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98.

[30] D. Horváth and R. Z. Szabó, “Driving forces and barriers of industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities?,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 146, pp. 119–132, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021.

[31] B. Tjahjono, C. Esplugues, E. Ares, and G. Pelaez, “What does industry 4.0 mean to supply chain?,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 13, pp. 1175–1182, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.191.

[32] G. Tortorella, F. S. Fogliatto, S. Gao, and T.-K. Chan, “Contributions of industry 4.0 to supply chain resilience,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 547– 566, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-12-2020-0494.

[33] M. Mladineo, I. Veza, and N. Gjeldum, “Solving partner selection problem in cyber-physical production networks using the HUMANT algorithm,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2506–2521, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1234084.

[34] S. Y. Barykin, A. A. Bochkarev, E. Dobronravin, and M. Sergeev, “The place and role of digital twin in supply chain management,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2021.

[35] M. Leite, T. Pinto, and C. Alves, “A real-time optimization algorithm for the integrated planning and scheduling problem towards the context of industry 4.0,” FME Transactions, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 775–781, 2019, doi: 10.5937/fmet1904775L.

[36] A. Kengpol and K. Elfvengren, “Avoiding covid-19 using a 3D digital mock up and augmented reality with cobot in digital factory,” Applied Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 15, no. 3, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.14416/j.asep.2021.11.011.

[37] K.-D. Thoben, S. A. Wiesner, and T. Wuest, “Industrie 4.0’ and smart manufacturing-a review of research issues and application examples,” International Journal of Automation Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 4–16, 2017, doi: 10.20965/ ijat.2017.p0004.

[38] H. M. Naeem and E. Di Maria, “Customer participation in new product development: An industry 4.0 perspective,” European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 637– 655, 2020, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-01-2021-0036.

[39] R. Jiao, S. Commuri, J. Panchal, J. Milisavljevic-Syed, J. K. Allen, F. Mistree, and D. Schaefer, “Design engineering in the age of industry 4.0,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 143, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.1115/1.4051041.

[40] M. V. P. Pessôa and J. M. J. Becker, “Smart design engineering: A literature review of the impact of the 4th industrial revolution on product design and development,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 175–195, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00163-020-00330-z.

[41] R. Y. Zhong, X. Xu, E. Klotz, and S. T. Newman, “Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: A review,” Engineering, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 616–630, 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.ENG. 2017.05.015.

[42] M. S. B. A. Rahman, E. Mohamad, and A. A. B. A. Rahman, “Development of IoT— enabled data analytics enhance decision support system for lean manufacturing process improvement,” Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 208–220, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1063293X20987911.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.14416/j.asep.2022.09.005


  • There are currently no refbacks.